Updated Thu 2 May 2019
- Reduce total energy use by myself and clients
- Use renewable energy where I can, offset the remainder
- Reuse and recycle
- Tips for choosing equipment: maximise lifetime and energy efficiency
- Carbon footprint for business travel and shipping
Reduce total energy use by myself and clients
My largest energy use is the web servers that run client websites 24 hours a day. I:
- Use VPS (virtual private) servers rather than dedicated servers; this is where the resources (processor, memory, disk) of physical server are shared between multiple users (but completely separate at a software level for security and reliability). It represents a big reduction in cost and energy use.
- Reduce VPS quantity by offering free-hosting to clients where appropriate (security and software versions are considerations here).
- Run latest software, optimise code and implement caching to reduce CPU load (e.g. PHP7 executes code much faster than 5.6).
- Use scaleable block storage to provide extra disk space (for backups etc.) as an alternative to a higher-specification VPS.
- Use CDNs (Content Delivery Networks) where appropriate (moving video/images etc. to a different location).
I work from home, so that removes the environmental impact of having a separate office and reduces travel.
Use renewable energy, carbon offset any that isn't
100% renewable electricity since 2011 – supplier Ecotricity
14% renewable gas as of May 2019 (2018: 12%, March 2017: 5% - Ecotricity have 1 anaerobic digester approved)
Web servers and cloud services
Only part of this is green energy and it's very complicated to calculate how much. Although I did find a datacenter that is currently using 100% green electricity (Bytemark; their supplier is Total Gas and Power - who use - to the best of my knowledge - RECs, but don't generate their own renewables), I have elected to stick with Linode/Telecity and offset my small carbon footprint for webservers multiple times over.
As the figures have so many caveats and I'm using relatively little energy for business work (~ 0.25 tonnes CO2 annually for webservers), I've decided to just offset a much greater amount:
- offsetting remains very cost-effective and you can do it a little at a time
- it helps covers non-business (domestic) energy usage - which is much higher due to heating etc.
- it helps compensate for usage of less efficient equipment in previous years
- the conservation projects you can support have intrinsic value
- April 2016: 5 ton CO2 offset (or approx 0.75 acres of protected land) via World Land Trust Carbon Balanced Programme
- August 2018: 1000 m2 protected Mexican Forest land via World Land Trust appeal
- May 2016 to April 2019 (ongoing): monthly donation to Trees for Cities (each roughly the equivalent of sponsoring a large canopy tree on a city street or several small trees in a park)
Why these charities?
Both the World Land Trust and Trees for Cities are UK based, established in 1989 and 1993 respectively. Their staffing levels are modest and they don't use aggressive fundraising tactics.
World Land Trust assists overseas NGOs in purchasing land (over 500,000 acres so far) for small-scale sustainable development. Rather than save specific species, controlling the land means the whole ecosystem is protected. Its patrons are David Gower, Chris Packham and Sir David Attenborough.
Trees for Cities has projects around the UK, especially in London. They combine tree-planting with education and community work. It's supported by Jon Snow, Alistair McGowan and others.
(I do not support activism, marches, protests, vandalism, so-called "direct action" etc.)
Estimating datacentre carbon footprint
TL;DR: My datacentre energy usage is low and I carbon-offset a far higher amount, but it's very hard to calculate precise usage due to lack of public information.
Most of my webservers are hosted by Linode, at Equinix Telecity's Powergate datacentre in Acton, West London.
All direct datacentre customers (i.e. those who leasing cages or racks from the datacentre operator) are billed on multiple criteria including power usage in amps. So it's in Linode's interests to keep consumption as low as possible, by selecting modern, power efficient components. They don't reveal details of all their exact hardware (this is quite common), but they are using Intel® Xeon® E5-2680v3 processors - these are very new - the CPU in a server is usually by far the biggest power drain (except for a spike when you first switch it on.)
Linode also only use SSDs, which (generally) have lower power consumption than spinning disks. They use DDR4 RAM, which is roughly 30% more power efficient than DDR3, running at a slightly lower voltage.
The datacentre is certified to ISO 50001 and its very energy efficient (a PUE of 1.35 with a modern cooling system, waste heat used to heat office space, rainwater harvesting, motion-activated lighting and Carbon Trust Standard certification.) Datacentres use around 2.5% of European electricity, so a lot of work is going into energy efficient design.
However, currently only 20-25% the data centre's electricity comes from renewable sources.
In 2015, Greenpeace Click Clean report gave Telecity a mix of C/D grades. By the next report in 2017, this had improved to B (now listed under Equinix, who acquired Telecity in Jan 2016).
I also use Amazon Web Services: specifically their S3 and Route 53 products, for backups, DNS and some web hosting of media/assets.
Percentage of Amazon energy use from renewables: 25% by April 2015, 40% by Dec 2016, 50% by Jan 2018.
My AWS usage is much lower than for the VPSs, as it's mostly data storage and low intensity work like responding to DNS queries. I also use AWS Glacier – its designed for infrequently accessed files – Amazon remain very secretive about how Glacier works, but the technology we think they're using is almost certain to need less energy.
As you can see, it's impossible to calculate an accurate carbon footprint when so many companies are involved and so much of it isn't in the public domain.
Occasionally they do provide information. For example, I use Gmail, and Google have calculated the average power consumption per Gmail user is 2.2 kWh per year.
Back-of-an-envelope carbon footprint calculation:
Based on info from Linode's CEO (these are 2008 figures based on US voltages!) a particular size of VPS uses about 7.5 watts, or 65 kWh a year, which is roughly 0.03 tonnes of CO2 (using the average UK grid energy mix).
This would mean the servers I'm responsible for generate about 0.25 tonnes a year.
However, this doesn't include all the other infrastructure, e.g. air-cooling, the use of the backup server, the data centre building, the fuel in the backup generators etc. or the energy used in equipment manufacture and datacentre construction.
Reuse and Recycle
- All paper/cardboard recycled through council waste collection scheme. (My work generates virtually no paper, however cardboard consumption, business and personal, is up significantly, as a result of online ordering.)
- All computer equipment recycled (either resale, gifting or council waste recycling centre). I'll usually hang onto things until I can dispose of a number of them at once, for efficiency/reducing cost/carbon emissions from travel.
- I hold on to working equipment I can make use of, e.g. I've a box specifically for USB cables, another for spare Apple power adaptors.
- Most computer hardware uses Li-ion batteries – I track charge cycles and capacity (I recommend the coconutBattery app for Apple users) and try to maximise ownership before replacement. For other products I use rechargeable NiMH AA/AAA batteries. As of 2019 the best NiMH rechargeable batteries are Fujitsu, but I have also previously used Sanyo/Panasonic Eneloop. I recommend purchasing from Battery Logic. I recycle used cells of all types at local collection points.
- I've so far failed to find anyone who can recycle my brand of Canon inkjet printer cartridges (there are a number of schemes which take used cartridges and pay small amounts of money to charity, but most are very choosy about which types they'll accept.)
- Li-ion: Maintain health by not fully charging (100%) or discharging (0%) in daily use; keep within 20% and 80% if you can.
- All types: charge at slower rates - slower charging is more energy efficient and you minimise heat / thermal stress on the battery.
- Wired charging is more energy efficient that wireless/inductive charging, which generates excess heat.
- Don't use combined smartphone/battery cases - they create excess heat, reduce signal strength, and the phone may deactivate power saving measures if it believes it is connected to a charger running on mains power, rather than another battery pack.
Tips for choosing equipment: maximise lifetime and energy efficiency
My desktop computer is a 2012 Apple Mac Mini I purchased November 2012. Apple describe this as "the world's most energy-efficient desktop computer", although you should remember it doesn't include a display (see below). A priority for me was something that used minimal energy when in standby (1.25W) but can wake up instantly when needed, without having to reopen applications or restart virtual machines.
You also want a computer that will last a good number of years – 67% of the greenhouse gas emissions for the Mac Mini (290kg or 0.29 tonnes of CO2) are from manufacture and shipping, and that's assuming a full four years of ownership (it has now lasted 7).
The Mac Mini has some environmental and practical advantages over other Apple products:
- you choose you own peripherals rather than replacing a complete system each time you upgrade - so I can hold onto:
- the display (Dell U2412M, purchased Nov 2012)
- keyboard The wired numeric keyboard is no longer sold by Apple, but you will be able to get it from other suppliers for a while. The first of these lasted 8 years, from my previous iMac purchased in 2009, itself a refurbished 2008 model. I normally use wired keyboards as it means one fewer device to recharge, the Apple one also provides extra USB sockets and generally there aren't significant benefits to wireless keyboards.
- trackpad (original Magic Trackpad, purchased Nov 2010)
- DVD drive (Nov 2012)
- speakers (Bose Companion 2 Series III multimedia, Sep 2015)
- Were it ever to go wrong, it's easy to transport for repair (or for use at another location with a display).
I bought the highest specification available at the time Apple refreshed the product line, with the view to using it for as long as possible (I'm hoping until at least
2018/2019 2020/2021). The only constraint so far has been disk space - in 2018 the internal hard drive failed and I took the opportunity to purchase a 2GB (twice as big) external SSD instead.
Besides anything else, upgrading a computer is time-consuming: there's the decision fatigue in choosing a new device and, despite migration tools, a lot of software inevitably needs to be reconfigured. You're also forced onto the most recent version of the operating system, which may be buggier than you'd like, and nowadays operating system upgrades (including MacOS) typically deliver only marginal benefits; most of the features you need have already been added. The value generally comes from updates to third party software which is usually supported by previous OS versions.
The Dell display meets various environmental certifications including EPEAT Gold. I can often use it comfortably use it with the brightness on the lowest setting (there's an energy gauge built in) and my measurements show it's usually using less than 10 watts. Would recommend, though occasionally I wish I'd chosen a larger one (not that often though). I don't feel I've especially lost out in any way by not having a retina display - HD video at 24" is still very sharp. Having a separate display rather than an iMac also makes it easier to adjust the height / exact position.
I use USB-powered WD My Passport drives for backups, these automatically spin down when not in use.
- I've reduced the OS X TimeMachine scheduled backup interval from every 1 to every 3 hours.
- I've changed the MacOS disk sleep interval from 10 minutes to 1:
sudo pmset -a disksleep 1
sudo pmset -g
Future drive purchases will be SSD to increase speed, provide equal or longer MTBF and reduce energy use.
Carbon footprint for business travel and shipping
|Year||Approx CO2 tonnes||Business travel methods|
|2018||0.01||train, underground, taxi|
|2019 (to 27 June)||0.084||train, underground, taxi|
(Very) occasionally I need to send packages.
DPD (who are my current preferred choice) carbon offset all their emissions.
UPS and others have introduced carbon neutral shipping at an extra price.